OpenEvidence

Xyla, Inc.

4.9

País del Editor	US
Fecha de Lanzamiento en el País	2024-08-15
Categorías	Education, Medical, Health & Fitness
Países / Regiones	US
Sitio Web del Desarrollador	Xyla, Inc.
URL de Soporte	Xyla, Inc.
Clasificación de Contenido	17+

Clinical Decision Support for Healthcare Professionals (NPI Required).

OpenEvidence is the world’s leading medical information platform for health care professionals, providing accurate and efficient answers at the point of care. Every answer on OpenEvidence is always sourced, cited, and grounded in the peer-reviewed medical literature.

Now featuring New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) published content, NEJM multimedia content, and NEJM invited review articles authored by the world’s leading clinical experts.

• 160 medical specialties
• 1,000+ diseases and therapeutic areas
• 1m+ medical topics

Trusted by medical professionals at 10,000+ care centers across the United States.

OpenEvidence is only available for health care professionals. Users must verify their health care professional status before using OpenEvidence.

AS SEEN IN

Forbes: “OpenEvidence Keeps Doctors Up To Date On The Latest Science”

TESTIMONIALS

“I’ve been using OpenEvidence for the last week - it has been amazing! Able to narrow down on results quickly and find information that I wasn’t able to do with Google/PubMed searches on my own.” - Dr. John Lee, MD. Physician & Faculty Member, Harvard Medical School

“OpenEvidence can be the foundational technology to power all clinical decision tools.” - Dr. Antonio Jorge Forte, MD. Director of MayoExpert, Mayo Clinic

“OpenEvidence is more up-to-date than UpToDate. And more useful regardless, since it’s interactive, and you can ask it questions, and get very specific answers about specific medical fact patterns in a patient case. It’s like having a curbside consult with a team of expert physicians, but that you can carry around with you in your pocket.” - Dr. Ram Dandillaya, MD. Clinical Chief, Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

“I am in community practice and medical director of a community cancer center. OpenEvidence has been an incredible lifeline for daily practitioners.” - C.J., Oncologist

“OpenEvidence is absolutely fantastic. I use it a gazillion times a day.” - J.A., Neurologist

“OpenEvidence’s efforts to make medicine more evidence-based are invaluable. The shift from judgment to calculation can reduce the level of noise currently found in medicine.” - Daniel Kahneman, Nobel Prize Laureate (In Memoriam)

“It is light years ahead of the next best medical oriented AI I have used.” - R.E…, Oncologist

STAY SHARP & UP-TO-DATE

• Find what you need, when you need it on a mobile-native platform.

• The world’s most powerful medical search engine at your fingertips.

• Discover and find exactly what you are looking for with deep search and a highly intuitive user interface that understands you and what you are asking.

Google Play App Store

1.56K+

Por Nine and wine
2024-09-26
Versión 1.3.0
Love it
I have been using this platform for over 6 months now, and it is both revolutionary and disruptive. Whether updating medical knowledge or searching for actionable up to date treatment plans, this AI reference is invaluable and beyond game changing. My patients (and myself) benefit from its powerful results on a daily basis. The answers are both thorough and accurate with extensive reference if you are an AI naysayer. Only negative I can synthesize is clinicians could be rendered obsolete with this phenomenal technology. In its current iteration, this tool is an invaluable adjunct to modern day medical practice. Adopt it or be left to perish! Much gratitude and many thanks to all who have made this technology readily available to all medical professionals and at no monetary cost. Truly amazing. Keep up the stellar work!
Por JenniferB76
2024-11-14
Versión 1.6.0
Feature RequestsInappropriateLove itUpdates
This is a fantastic app. It generates fast, clear and succinct answers to questions, but there are some issues to be aware of. I have found that in practice, you REALLY need to use the right prompts, or some of the information you receive may be incomplete or misleading. For instance, it may not provide you information pertinent to special populations (ie pregnancy), unless you think to ask for this specificity. I also found that when asking about treatment options, it may provide options but will not go into details of the risks associated with these options unless specifically prompted. I also noticed it will sometimes generate information that is not fully correct if the prompt is too general. For instance I typed “magnet runaway pacemaker.” I expected to get information on the runaway pacemaker condition and how to use a magnet to stabilize it. But what I got was “A magnet runaway pacemaker refers to a malfunction of a pacemaker that results in erratic and rapid pacing due to the inappropriate activation of the device’s magnet response mode.” I think this will eventually be an incredible application of AI for as a tool for medical practice. Looking forward to future updates.
Por murseZ
2025-02-22
Versión 2.2.2
Love it
I’ve experimented with ChatGPT as well for medical guidance and with appropriate wording requests it is often helpful summarize medical guidelines, etc…. BUT I’ve found mistakes at times, so have used with caution. OPEN EVIDENCE however is so much more helpful in pulling together from only medical sources& is easy to see provided sources quickly & follow up with additional questions, rationales, pharmacokinetics, pathophysiology, etc. Love it, especially to help my continued learning/critical thinking as a fairly new practitioner, without extensive time scanning multiple articles/sites.